Trucking Companies List by State and Revenue (2026)

Shippers ask “who are the top carriers?” for a simple reason: freight service quality is expensive to get wrong. One missed pickup, a preventable accessorial charge, a surprise reclassification, or a late delivery that shuts down a production line can wipe out months of savings from choosing a cheaper rate. When a shipping manager needs a fast, defensible shortlist, they often start with the biggest names in the market.

Revenue becomes the most common “objective” yardstick in that first pass because it usually correlates with scale: more terminals, more drivers, more capacity options, more lane coverage, and stronger infrastructure for claims, billing, and visibility. But revenue is not the same thing as “best,” and it is not a guarantee of fit. A carrier can be large and still be wrong for your lane mix, freight profile, accessorial needs, or service expectations.

Top LTL freight companies (2026 shortlist)

The LTL carriers below are widely recognized as leading providers because they operate established terminal networks and offer service features that many shippers require, such as residential options, liftgate, appointments, limited access, and expedited LTL alternatives. The list is separated from truckload intentionally because LTL performance is driven by terminal execution and network design, not just the number of tractors on the road.

Each mini profile includes headquarters, founding year, website, what the carrier is known for, best-fit shipper scenarios, and situations where it may be a poor fit or require extra caution.

The top 10 LTL freight companies

FedEx Freight

Headquarters: Memphis, Tennessee
Founded: 1973

What it’s known for
FedEx Freight is commonly associated with large-scale LTL network capabilities and a brand ecosystem that many shipping teams already touch through parcel operations. That brand familiarity can simplify vendor onboarding and internal reporting in organizations that already use FedEx services.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers who want a large-network LTL provider with broad market recognition
• Organizations that value standardized processes and prefer well-defined service options
• Mixed freight operations that want an LTL anchor carrier alongside other providers for lane balancing

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Freight profiles with chronic accessorial exposure (residential, liftgate, limited access) unless the shipper’s quoting and documentation process is extremely consistent
• Shippers with poor packaging discipline, because LTL handling requires freight to survive multiple terminal touches
• Operations that cannot tolerate billing variance and do not have a process for quickly disputing reweigh, reclass, or accessorial charges

XPO

Headquarters: Greenwich, Connecticut
Founded: 2011

What it’s known for
XPO is positioned as a major LTL player with a modern corporate structure and a scale presence that attracts shippers seeking robust national coverage. Many shippers look to XPO for network breadth and structured service offerings.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers with multi-region distribution who want a nationally relevant LTL option
• Organizations that want a carrier with the operational footprint to support regular scheduled LTL volume
• Shippers that need clear process alignment and consistent tendering workflows

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Highly specialized freight requiring unusual handling rules unless the shipper confirms terminal-level capability
• Lanes with historically high exception rates, where the shipper does not have internal resources to manage exceptions and escalations
• Residential-heavy programs where accessorial discipline is weak and delivery conditions vary widely by receiver

Old Dominion Freight Line

Headquarters: Thomasville, North Carolina
Founded: 1934

What it’s known for
Old Dominion is frequently discussed as a premium-service LTL carrier. Shippers often associate the brand with strong execution discipline, claims performance, and reliable transit consistency, especially when freight is packaged properly and shipment data is accurate.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers prioritizing service consistency over lowest-possible base rate
• High-value freight that benefits from tight claims and handling discipline
• Regular-volume shippers who want predictable performance and structured pickup/delivery processes

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Shippers who only shop on lowest price and are not willing to pay for premium consistency
• Freight that is frequently under-declared or misclassified, which can cause billing disputes even with high-performing carriers
• Shippers with frequent last-minute changes to appointment requirements or delivery conditions

TForce Freight

Headquarters: Richmond, Virginia
Founded: 1935

What it’s known for
TForce Freight is a long-established LTL operation with an East Coast headquarters base and a national presence. It is often evaluated by shippers that want a recognized LTL carrier option with broad service patterns.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers seeking additional competitive options in lanes where a small number of LTL carriers dominate pricing
• Organizations building a two-carrier LTL strategy to reduce risk and improve negotiation leverage
• Shippers whose freight fits standard LTL handling and who can provide accurate shipment data

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Lanes with tight delivery windows where the shipper has no tolerance for occasional variability
• Programs with frequent limited access and inside delivery needs unless those requirements are consistently declared and confirmed
• Freight that is difficult to handle (oversized pallets, unstable stacks) without improved packaging standards

Estes Express Lines

Headquarters: Richmond, Virginia
Founded: 1931

What it’s known for
Estes is one of the most recognizable long-standing LTL brands, often evaluated for its terminal network depth and ability to support general LTL freight at scale.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers with regular palletized freight that fits standard LTL parameters
• Businesses shipping across multiple regions that want a dependable network presence
• Operations that need common LTL accessorial services and prefer a carrier with established processes

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Freight that is frequently “non-standard” in dimensions or packaging, increasing the risk of reclassification or damage
• Receiver networks that trigger repeated accessorial charges without a consistent quoting workflow
• Shippers who expect truckload-like simplicity in billing and service; LTL requires structured data discipline

ABF Freight / ArcBest

Headquarters: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Founded: 1923

What it’s known for
ABF Freight is the LTL carrier brand associated with ArcBest. Shippers should pay attention to the carrier-versus-parent distinction in revenue discussions, because ABF is the operating LTL provider while ArcBest is the broader corporate structure.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers who want an LTL carrier with long-standing market presence and structured freight service
• Operations that value consistency and want a carrier that can be evaluated lane-by-lane rather than purely by brand name
• Businesses that prefer to align with an organization that operates across multiple logistics segments under a corporate umbrella, when that matters for procurement

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Shippers who compare revenue figures without clarifying whether they refer to ABF Freight or ArcBest consolidated operations
• Freight that is prone to damage due to packaging issues; terminal handling requires packaging discipline
• High-accessorial delivery environments without strong documentation and receiver instruction processes

R+L Carriers

Headquarters: Wilmington, Ohio
Founded: 1965

What it’s known for
R+L Carriers is a major LTL provider with a recognizable network presence and a headquarters base in Ohio, which can be relevant for shippers with strong Midwest flows.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers with Midwest density or multi-region distribution who want a strong LTL option
• Programs that require standard LTL accessorials and benefit from a large network footprint
• Shippers building a portfolio approach to LTL, where R+L is one of several core carriers by lane

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Shipment profiles with unstable pallet builds, poor stretch-wrapping, or overhang, which increase damage risk
• Residential-heavy programs that do not consistently specify liftgate, appointment, or inside delivery needs at time of quote
• Shippers who do not have a process for managing exceptions and billing disputes quickly

Saia

Headquarters: Johns Creek, Georgia
Founded: 1924

What it’s known for
Saia is a long-established LTL carrier with headquarters in Georgia and a network that many shippers consider for reliable LTL execution in a variety of lanes.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers with repeatable LTL freight profiles that value predictable service processes
• Businesses with Southeast shipping density that want a strong carrier candidate for lane testing
• Organizations that want to diversify their LTL carrier mix for negotiation leverage and risk reduction

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Highly irregular shipping programs where pickup and delivery conditions change frequently and create accessorial disputes
• Freight that requires unusually strict handling rules unless those are confirmed and documented
• Shippers that rely on last-minute changes to delivery timing without formal appointment processes

Southeastern Freight Lines

Headquarters: Lexington, South Carolina
Founded: 1950

What it’s known for
Southeastern Freight Lines is commonly viewed as a strong regional LTL provider with deep expertise and density in the Southeast, which can translate into performance advantages in lanes where regional density matters more than national branding.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers with heavy Southeast lane activity who want strong regional execution
• Businesses that prefer a carrier known for regional density, directness, and lane familiarity
• Operations that want to benchmark a regional leader against national carriers for the same lanes

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Shipments that are primarily outside the carrier’s strongest density zones, where performance may not match the Southeast core
• Shippers with inconsistent shipment data quality that triggers classification and billing friction
• Freight that is not packaged for terminal handling or has high damage sensitivity without upgraded packaging standards

Averitt Express

Headquarters: Cookeville, Tennessee
Founded: 1971

What it’s known for
Averitt Express is frequently evaluated by shippers for LTL services, especially when a shipper values a carrier that can align well with certain regional and service patterns.

Best-fit shipper scenarios

• Shippers with lanes where Averitt’s network density and service model align well with pickup and delivery expectations
• Businesses needing LTL services with common accessorial requirements, provided they are consistently declared
• Shippers that want an additional strong carrier option in the Southeast and adjacent markets

When not to use, or when to use with extra caution

• Programs with chronic accessorial exposure if shipment instructions are not standardized
• Freight that is frequently reworked, repalletized, or shipped with incomplete documentation
• High-urgency shipments where any network variability is unacceptable unless an expedited service is explicitly selected and confirmed

Top truckload freight companies (2026 shortlist)

Truckload carriers are best evaluated through the lens of equipment, lane strategy, and operating model. Unlike LTL, which is built around terminal networks and consolidation, truckload performance is shaped by trailer utilization, driver and tractor availability, and the carrier’s ability to cover specific lanes reliably through either contract, dedicated, or well-managed spot capacity.

The carrier mini profiles below focus on primary services and “good for” shipper patterns so you can quickly match the carrier type to your freight reality.

The top truckload carriers

Knight-Swift Transportation

Headquarters: Phoenix, Arizona
Website: knight-swift.com
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated, brokerage, intermodal, drayage

Good for shipper patterns

• Large shippers that need broad truckload capacity and multiple service lanes under one provider umbrella
• Contract freight and dedicated programs where predictable capacity is more important than chasing spot pricing
• Shippers that benefit from combining carrier capacity with brokerage and intermodal options to balance cost and coverage

Schneider

Headquarters: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Website: schneider.com
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated, expedited, intermodal, specialized

Good for shipper patterns

• Contract-heavy shippers that value structured operating processes and coverage across many lanes
• Shippers who need intermodal as part of a broader transportation mix
• Freight programs that require a blend of standard truckload and specialized service options

Landstar

Headquarters: Jacksonville, Florida
Primary services: Truckload, LTL, dedicated, expedited, heavy haul

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers that need flexible capacity sourcing across diverse freight types, including expedited and heavy haul
• Projects where coverage needs change frequently and a flexible model is valuable
• Shippers who want access to a broad capacity marketplace rather than a single fleet-only approach

J.B. Hunt

Headquarters: Lowell, Arkansas
Primary services: Intermodal, drayage, truckload, dedicated, brokerage

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers who want intermodal and drayage capabilities integrated into broader freight planning
• High-volume retail and manufacturing operations with predictable lanes suitable for dedicated or intermodal
• Shippers that want a large provider with both asset-based and brokerage-based options

Prime

Headquarters: Springfield, Missouri
Primary services: Refrigerated truckload, flatbed, tanker

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers needing temperature-controlled truckload capacity as a core service
• Freight profiles requiring flatbed or tanker options under a single carrier relationship
• Long-haul freight where equipment specialization is a deciding factor

Werner Enterprises

Headquarters: Omaha, Nebraska
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated, expedited, temperature controlled, flatbed

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers needing a mix of dry van and temperature-controlled services
• Contract freight and dedicated programs where consistent capacity is critical
• Shippers that benefit from a carrier capable of supporting multiple equipment types

CRST

Headquarters: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Primary services: Truckload, expedited, dedicated, flatbed

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers that require expedited solutions alongside standard truckload coverage
• Dedicated capacity needs where route consistency and capacity commitment matter
• Freight requiring flatbed options as part of a broader truckload strategy

US Xpress

Headquarters: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers seeking standard truckload and dedicated capacity in lanes where the network aligns well
• Contract freight where service expectations are defined and repeatable
• Operations that want a dedicated solution rather than relying entirely on spot coverage

Crete Carrier

Headquarters: Lincoln, Nebraska
Primary services: Truckload, temperature controlled, specialized

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers that want a carrier capable of handling both standard truckload and temperature-controlled freight
• Lanes where consistent service outcomes and predictable coverage are prioritized
• Freight profiles that benefit from specialized attention rather than purely price-driven spot selection

C.R. England

Headquarters: Salt Lake City, Utah
Primary services: Truckload, temperature controlled, intermodal, dedicated

Good for shipper patterns

• Reefer and temperature-controlled freight that needs national coverage options
• Shippers that use a combination of intermodal, dedicated, and truckload services
• Longer-haul lanes where a structured carrier relationship improves reliability

Roadrunner Transportation

Headquarters: Downers Grove, Illinois
Primary services: Truckload, LTL, temperature controlled

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers that want a provider capable of supporting both truckload and LTL under one brand relationship
• Temperature-controlled freight programs that need additional carrier options beyond the largest reefer-focused carriers
• Mixed networks where lane-by-lane solutions are more realistic than a single-mode strategy

Covenant Transport

Headquarters: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Primary services: Truckload, expedited

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers with time-sensitive freight needs where expedited capability is a priority
• Truckload programs that require clear expectations and consistent tendering discipline
• Lanes where service speed matters more than squeezing the absolute lowest rate

Western Express

Headquarters: Nashville, Tennessee
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated, flatbed

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers needing standard truckload capacity with the option to add dedicated or flatbed support
• Freight programs that can be standardized and repeated, which improves service consistency
• Lane networks where flexible capacity options help manage seasonal fluctuations

Heartland Express

Headquarters: North Liberty, Iowa
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated

Good for shipper patterns

• Contract freight that benefits from stable, repeatable capacity planning
• Dedicated routes where service consistency is the main KPI
• Shippers that want a straightforward truckload and dedicated relationship without complex mode mixing

Ruan

Headquarters: Des Moines, Iowa
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated

Good for shipper patterns

• Dedicated operations where routes, schedules, and service expectations are well-defined
• Shippers who value predictable execution and operational alignment over spot-market shopping
• Lane networks that support long-term planning rather than one-off spot moves

Marten Transport

Headquarters: Mondovi, Wisconsin
Primary services: Temperature controlled truckload

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers with reefer-heavy freight that need a carrier centered on temperature-controlled execution
• Food, beverage, and sensitive product freight where temperature compliance is central
• Contract freight where consistency and compliance outrank spot price

Universal Logistics

Headquarters: Warren, Michigan
Primary services: Truckload, dedicated

Good for shipper patterns

• Dedicated and contract freight programs that require operational alignment and planning
• Shippers who prefer a structured, relationship-based approach to capacity
• Lane networks where reliability and repeatability are more valuable than rate volatility

P.A.M. Transport

Headquarters: Tontitown, Arkansas
Primary services: Truckload, expedited, dedicated

Good for shipper patterns

• Shippers that need a blend of standard truckload and expedited options
• Dedicated capacity programs with stable lane requirements
• Freight networks where the shipper wants an additional competitive carrier option in core lanes

Top trucking, moving & storage companies by revenue (snapshot as of early 2026)

Revenue snapshots are useful because they quickly show scale. However, scale in transportation can mean very different things depending on what the company actually does. Some organizations on revenue lists are pure freight-hauling carriers. Others operate in moving and storage, cold storage logistics, or broader relocation services. A revenue figure alone does not tell you whether you are looking at an LTL carrier, a truckload fleet, a residential moving operator, or a warehousing-focused logistics business.

Before reviewing the list below, it is important to clarify how to interpret it.

Why this revenue snapshot may not match “pure trucking” rankings

Many “largest companies” lists mix multiple sub-industries that sit under the broader umbrella of transportation and logistics. This can lead to confusion if a shipper is searching specifically for freight carriers but sees moving or storage companies appearing alongside them.

Revenue lists may include:

• Trucking carriers
  Companies that operate LTL, truckload, dedicated, flatbed, tanker, or temperature-controlled freight services.
• Moving & storage companies
  Businesses focused on residential and commercial relocation, long-term storage, and corporate relocation programs. While they operate trucks, their operating model, liability structure, and customer base differ from freight carriers.
• Cold storage and logistics providers
  Organizations that manage warehousing, temperature-controlled storage, and integrated logistics services. Some operate trucks, but many are primarily storage and distribution businesses rather than over-the-road carriers.

If you compare a national LTL carrier directly with a residential moving company purely on revenue, you are not comparing like-for-like operating models. This post will clearly label the category context for each company to prevent misinterpretation.

What this means for shippers:

• Use this revenue snapshot to understand scale within the broader logistics landscape.
• Do not assume that every company on the list is a direct competitor in LTL or truckload freight.
• Always confirm the primary operating mode before shortlisting a provider for freight transportation.

What this list includes:
The snapshot below blends trucking carriers with moving, storage, and logistics-related businesses as presented in the provided data. Categories will be clarified in accompanying commentary so readers do not compare unlike-for-unlike.

Revenue snapshot list (early 2026 reference)

The following companies are listed by revenue as provided in the source material:

• ABF Freight - $2.5B
  Category: LTL freight carrier (associated with ArcBest corporate structure)
  Headquarters: Fort Smith, Arkansas
• Two Men and a Truck - $1.6B
  Category: Moving & storage
  Headquarters: Lansing, Michigan
• All My Sons Moving & Storage - $1.6B
  Category: Moving & storage
  Headquarters: Carrollton, Texas
• United States Cold Storage - $1.1B
  Category: Cold storage & logistics
  Headquarters: Camden, New Jersey
• SIRVA - $947.1M
  Category: Moving, relocation, and related logistics services
  Headquarters: Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois
• The Armstrong Company - $770.7M
  Category: Moving & storage
  Headquarters: Memphis, Tennessee
• PAM Transportation - $747.2M
  Category: Truckload carrier
  Headquarters: Tontitown, Arkansas
• Suddath - $653.2M
  Category: Moving, relocation, and logistics services
  Headquarters: Jacksonville, Florida
• Heil Trailer - $592M
  Category: Trailer manufacturing (not a freight carrier, but part of the broader trucking ecosystem)
  Headquarters: Athens, Tennessee
• Spee-Dee Delivery Service - $587.8M
  Category: Regional delivery and transportation services
  Headquarters: Saint Cloud, Minnesota

This list illustrates why revenue context matters. ABF Freight appears alongside moving companies and even a trailer manufacturer. While all operate within transportation-related industries, they serve different customer needs. A shipper searching specifically for LTL capacity should not treat Two Men and a Truck or United States Cold Storage as substitutes for a national LTL carrier.